Within the artistic context there is the concept of muses, often used in various situations, objects, people or a host of other sources of inspiration for those who engage in creative production. For me, this muse often comes with the aesthetic experience produced by the works of other artistic exponents who have influenced my thoughts and productions.
The works of abstract impressionism have always caught my attention. In my experience, content in color and texture within the pieces lend themselves to a much wider personal interpretation. Furthermore, combining a contemporary context with the various interpretations and values that exist between color, shape and material result in this series of digital drawings, also there's the creative part of playing with the same idea between the name of the piece and the content, just like the original authors did with some satire tone .
In analyzing the situations of these works with my immediate context I have noticed that there are discourses in contemporary times that can take one to very different interpretations of pieces, some of which had not even been considered at the time of their creation, at times implying things such as technological advances, scientific knowledge, and changes in social thinking, among others characteristics. And to be precise it's interesting how the pieces break the walls of time and cultures, and continue their process of creating aesthetic experiences through different historical contexts
Never too late to Flavin, 2016.
To Dan Flavin who lacked ladders, 2016.
Streches made by Fontana, 2016.
Hey Luccio, 2016
